THANK YOU FOR SUBMITTING YOUR VACANCY

The UK Aerospace and Defence sector continues to deliver some of the most complex and critical programmes in the world. From advanced engineering projects and next-generation defence systems to space exploration and emerging technologies, organisations need highly specialised teams to deliver successfully. However, securing the right talent is becoming increasingly difficult. For businesses operating in regulated environments, recruitment is rarely just about finding someone with the right technical skills. Candidates often need specific industry experience, security clearance, and the ability to contribute to programmes where precision and reliability are essential. The five main hiring challenges faced by UK Aerospace and Defence organisations are: Accessing security-cleared specialist talent Competing for highly skilled engineers Reducing time-to-hire without compromising quality Building talent pipelines for future technologies Attracting experienced professionals in a competitive market 1. ACCESSING SECURITY-CLEARED SPECIALIST TALENT Security clearance requirements are essential across many defence roles, but they also create a much smaller pool of available candidates. For organisations working on sensitive programmes, finding professionals who already hold the appropriate clearance can significantly reduce hiring timelines. However, these individuals are often already engaged on existing projects and are unlikely to be actively applying for new opportunities. Common challenges include: Limited availability of candidates with active security clearance Competition between organisations for experienced professionals Lengthy clearance processes impacting project delivery timelines Difficulty identifying candidates with both technical expertise and clearance eligibility A specialist recruitment partner like Meritus can help organisations navigate these challenges by understanding clearance requirements, accessing established talent networks, and identifying candidates who may not be visible through traditional recruitment channels. 2. COMPETING FOR HIGHLY SKILLED ENGINEERS Engineering expertise sits at the heart of Aerospace and Defence. However, many organisations are competing for the same specialist skill sets. Professionals with experience across areas such as systems engineering, embedded software, mechanical design, aerospace manufacturing, and defence technologies remain highly sought after. For employers, this creates several challenges: Smaller available talent pools for niche technical roles Increased competition from adjacent industries such as technology and energy Difficulty replacing experienced professionals approaching retirement Pressure to secure expertise quickly to support programme deadlines Recruiting for these roles requires more than simply advertising a vacancy. Organisations need a clear understanding of the market, where talent sits, and what motivates experienced professionals to move. 3. REDUCING TIME-TO-HIRE WITHOUT COMPROMISING QUALITY Aerospace and Defence organisations cannot afford to make rush hiring decisions, but lengthy recruitment processes can create delays. When a specialist role remains open, the impact can extend beyond the recruitment team. Project milestones, engineering capacity, and delivery schedules can all be affected. Organisations should consider: Reviewing internal approval processes to remove unnecessary delays Building relationships with specialist talent before vacancies arise Maintaining regular market insight on salary expectations and candidate availability Partnering with recruiters who understand the technical and compliance requirements of the sector A proactive approach to hiring allows businesses to respond faster when critical requirements emerge.

There’s a conversation happening in UK aviation that isn’t said out loud in hangars or management meetings. Aleck Mehra , our Head of MRO Services, speaks with aerospace engineers across the country every day and has gathered insight into where engineers feel the industry has been heading in recent months. The conversation is not about lack of work, and it's not about the lack of demand for engineers (since there is critical demand for B1/B2 Engineers in the UK market currently). It’s about money not flowing through the system in a way that reflects the reality on the floor. Across the UK, aerospace engineers are starting to notice the same pattern: rates feel stuck, perm salaries have flattened in a lot of places, and the gap between responsibility and reward has stopped making sense in the way it used to. At the same time, the complexity of the work has not gone down. If anything, it has increased: new aircraft types, ageing fleets, tighter turnaround expectations, heavier compliance requirements, and more documentation are layered on top of the actual engineering. In the UK specifically, that pressure is being amplified by a tougher operating environment across aviation. Brexit regulatory change, combined with broader economic pressure on airlines and MROs, has created a market where margins are tighter and cost control is far more aggressive. This is very visible in the stability of some operators, with recent insolvencies such as European Cargo and Ascend Airways reflecting how fragile parts of the sector have become. This is felt directly by engineers on the shop floor. MROs are being asked to deliver more output with constrained budgets, while also navigating ongoing staffing shortages and more complex licensing and compliance requirements introduced through the post EU framework. The result is a squeeze that sits between financial pressure at organisational level and delivery expectations at engineering level, and it is changing how the work is experienced day to day. You end up with a market where: • The work is harder than it was 5 years ago • The responsibility is higher than it was 5 years ago • But the financial movement does not match either It’s now far more common for experienced engineers to contract abroad where both accommodation and flights are more likely to be paid for. This migration of talent from the UK further constricts the UK B1 market, making it harder for MROs to stay fully-staffed and operational. 

Hiring Aerospace, Defence and Space talent hasn't got easier. It's become more selective. Organisations are competing for increasingly scarce skills across engineering, project controls, programme management, cyber security, software development and highly cleared environments. At the same time, experienced professionals have become far more discerning about the opportunities they pursue. Employer Value Propositions (EVPs) are becoming a critical part of talent acquisition strategy. Not because they're simply an employer branding exercise, but because they directly influence whether ADS professionals choose your organisation over another opportunity, and whether they remain engaged once they join. WHAT ARE AEROSPACE, DEFENCE AND SPACE PROFESSIONALS LOOKING FOR TODAY? Candidates are less likely to move unless the opportunity offers meaningful value beyond compensation. Whilst salary remains important, engineers, programme leaders and technical specialists are increasingly evaluating the wider environment they'll be joining. Candidates are consistently prioritising: Competitive compensation and benefits Long-term programme stability and security Meaningful work with real-world impact Clear progression and professional development opportunities Strong technical leadership and engineering culture Access to complex and challenging projects Confidence in programme funding and organisational stability The opportunity to contribute to critical national capability and innovation If these factors aren't communicated clearly, candidates often disengage before the process reaches offer stage. Purpose and impact are becoming increasingly important, particularly amongst highly skilled professionals who want to understand how their work contributes to something bigger. In Aerospace, Defence and Space environments, candidates are not only choosing a role. They're carefully selecting a programme, a mission and a long-term commitment. Job security has also become increasingly important. As organisations continue to navigate budget pressures, contract cycles and changing programme priorities, candidates are taking a more cautious approach to career moves. They are not asking: "Is this a better role?" They're actively questioning and deliberating on: "Is this a programme worth committing my expertise to?" FLEXIBILITY STILL MATTERS, BUT STABILITY AND PURPOSE MATTER MORE Flexible working continues to play an important role in attracting talent. However, in Aerospace, Defence and Space sectors, the conversation is often more nuanced. Security requirements, programme sensitivity and on-site delivery requirements mean flexibility can look very different to other industries. Whilst hybrid working remains an important consideration for many professionals, candidates are increasingly focused on wider questions around programme stability, organisational purpose and long-term career opportunities. They are assessing: The longevity of programmes and contracts The quality of leadership Opportunities for professional growth The complexity and significance of the work Whether the organisation is investing in future capability Flexibility remains important, but for many ADS professionals it forms part of a much broader decision-making process. WHY AN EVP MATTERS MORE THAN EVER Too often an EVP is reduced to: A careers page A list of benefits Generic statements about culture and values In reality, your EVP is the reason an engineer, programme professional or ADS specialist chooses your organisation over another. It should be visible throughout the hiring process, onboarding experience and day-to-day culture. Organisations with a clear and well-communicated EVP typically: Attract stronger specialist talent pipelines Convert more offers Reduce reliance on inflated salaries Improve retention within critical programmes Accelerate productivity for new hires Strengthen employee engagement and capability The strongest organisations are creating environments where people can make a genuine impact, develop their careers and contribute to meaningful programmes, then communicating that consistently throughout the hiring process. Where EVP is weak: Time-to-hire increases Candidate drop-off rises Recruitment costs increase Critical skills gaps emerge Programme delivery risks grow Attrition impacts organisational capability For organisations operating in highly regulated and technically complex ADS environments, talent challenges rarely remain recruitment challenges for long. They quickly become business risks.